Tag Archives: knowledge

Theory into Practice: Blooming the Curriculum with One Word – “So…”

Posted on by
Reply

Tested practices created from research-based theories give teachers the best instructional opportunities to cause all children to learn.

It is easy to think of teaching and learning as linear. We teach and children learn one thing then another and another. Learning is an additive like train cars on a railroad line running through a classroom. Each car arrives with facts and skills to be taught and learned before it leaves the classroom/station, and the next train car of facts and skills arrives. There is more truth in this analogy that teachers want to admit. We change this perception with one word – “so.” All a teacher needs to do to move teaching and learning from a linear to a geometric design is to ask “So, what can/will/should you …” and teaching and learning launch vertically from children waiting for the next lesson to children doing higher orders of cognition with what they have already learned. It is blooming wonderfully!

What do we know?

The names of historic education and psychology theoreticians are fixed in our teacher preparation programs. Their names appear in texts and as footnote references. Piaget, Dewey, Vygotsky, Montessori, Skinner, Bruner, et al. Teacher licensing candidates learn to pair a name with a concept the historic person developed, take a test or write a paper acknowledging that person’s name and concept, and then allow the forgetting curve to move the name and theory into their memory fog. Who was that? What theory?

Stop doing this! Teaching and learning theories matter because theories give us road maps for how to transform schooling from linear – learn to test- to geometric – learn to think and do.

Benjamin Bloom, psychologist and pedagogue, gave us a systematic template to describe, assess, and classify educational goals. Bloom published his Taxonomy in 1956 and for decades teacher preparation schools taught Bloom’s cognitive domain, and six levels of cognition often called higher order thinking skills. Seventy years later, Bloom is still the go-to resource for describing and detailing levels of cognitive goals.

“So,” elevates your teaching and student learning.

The baseline of Bloom’s Taxonomy is the teaching and learning of background knowledge and a basic understanding of that knowledge. All children need to learn words that name and describe things in their world. So, we teach them to read and listen and build working vocabularies. Bloom categorizes the first goals of learning as level 1 – remembering and level 2 – understanding. A great deal of PreK-, 4K, and kindergarten involves experientially exposing children to words and facts and remembering and understanding.

In his research for his studies, Bloom saw that most classroom instruction at many grade levels was at level 1 and level 2 goals. Teachers used direct instruction to teach information for children to remember and describe. Teachers tested children, recorded learning scores, and began teaching the next lesson of information to be learned. Teaching and learning bobbled back and forth between remembering and understanding.

Bloom changed the goals of learning by interjecting “so what” into teaching. “So, what can you do with this information?” “So, how is this information like or unlike other information?” “So, which is a better choice in the use of this information?” And “So, what could you create from this information that is new and different?” Each of these questions is indicative of a higher level of cognition requiring children to think differently to answer the question. Bloom labeled these questions and placed them in a roster of unique learning goals.

Bloom’s Taxonomy: Each is a different category of learning goals needing distinct kinds of cognitive thinking. The goal is to –

  • Remember
  • Understand
  • Apply
  • Analyze
  • Evaluate
  • Create.

These goals are not sequential as in a continuum. The first two goals – remembering and understanding are goals for creating background knowledge – necessary for all learning to follow. Later learning builds upon the breadth and depth of a child’s foundational background knowledge. This tells us why children in the primary grades receive extensive direct instruction in reading, ELA, math, science, and social studies. And why direct instruction of required information fills the first chapters and units of middle school and high school instruction. Knowing things is necessary for the later goals of thinking about and working with that knowledge.

To build the goal of remembering, teachers use questions like –

  • Identification – What is the capital of Wisconsin? Of France?
  • Definition – What is the meaning of the word precipitation?
  • Listing – List the three branches of the US federal government?
  • Recall – When did the Civil War take place? When did the first man walk on the moon?
  • Recognition – Which of these formulas is correct for the area of a square?

The work of identifying, defining, listing, recalling, and recognizing words expands a child’s working vocabulary in their seeing, hearing, writing, speaking, and imaging more new words. Each question requires a child to write or speak a word in a different way that builds memory. Five to seven uses of the word reinforce short-term memory, and 15 to 17 different uses reinforce long-term memory.

Parallel to remembering words is understanding – the ways that people talk about and use words. The traditional model for remembering and then understanding is to “Say the word, spell the word, and use the word in a sentence.”

To build the goal of understanding, teachers use questions like –

  • Classify – Tell me the kinds of animals eat meat? … eat plants?
  • Describe – Describe what a Green Bay Packer would see standing in the middle of Lambeau Field just before the start of an NFL game.
  • Discuss – Tell me why World War Two is labeled a world war.
  • Translate – Rewrite this word problem into a mathematical equation.

Understanding requires definition of a word and opens a child to word families of synonyms, antonyms, and homonyms. Typical five-year olds have a vocabulary of 10,000 words. Once in school, their vocabulary grows by 3,000 to 5,000 words each year. The rate of vocabulary growth continues until typical high school students know about 50,000 words. The next learning goals give power the words a child knows and understands.

It is important to remember that, although application, analysis, evaluation, and synthesis goals are not sequential, a child’s experience in one will have tangential benefit to the others.

After securing children in meeting the goals of remembering and understanding, a teacher can instruct them in exploring what a person can do with the information learned. This goal is application. True application happens when children use the information or skill or rule to answer a question or solve problem they have not seen before – application requires new contexts.

To build the goal of application, teachers use questions like –

  • Solving – If the hypotenuse is three, what are the lengths of the sides of the triangle.
  • Stimulating – If you were an actor on stage, how would you react to applause after you deliver your lines? Or after the end of the play?
  • Demonstrating – What are examples that show this rule works in the real world?
  • Implementing – If you only had two tools – a scissors and a stapler – and a sheet of cardboard, show us how you would construct a box.

The goal of application is to produce something – a performance, an explanation, a diagram, or a product. A teacher can present children with a “messy” problem or a mystery that includes the words “what if.” These words invite the child to use all they know to solve, react, prove, or implement what they know and to produce something in a new situation. Often the product is an answer on a test requiring a child to consider what they know in an unanticipated word problem. In a real-world context, the ability to apply is the goal of most adult work life problems.

A different goal for learning is analysis. As the goal of application is to produce something in a new context, the goal of analysis is to dissect information looking for patterns, the relationships between parts, and hidden meanings.

To build the goal of analysis, teachers ask questions like –

  • Relationships – What is the connection between global warming and the strength and patterns of hurricanes?
  • Evidence – Which parts of this answer are based upon facts, and which parts are based upon opinion?
  • Categorizing – How would you classify these statements as causes or outcomes from the American Revolution?
  • Deconstructing – Separate this poem into its elements.

Analysis teaches children to be critical thinkers and to question and inquire into the nature of information. Teachers show children how to use charts, diagrams, and tables to show, organize, and rationalize similarities and differences. Children think and reason like historians and scientists. They study an event for its underlying causes and later effects. They guess how the absence of an underlying cause or sparking event may have changed history. Children chart and map chemical reactions to understand how elements relate and react to each other. They chart and map climatic events to understand forecasting. As application creates products, analysis dissects information into its critical attributes.

Educators gave an acronym to Bloom’s categorization of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis goals. They ar labeled as HOTS – higher order thinking skills. Ironically, HOTS should be the dominant goals of secondary education, but the curricular calendar relegates them to specific upper-level courses and a fraction of the school year. Best practice is for children at all grade levels, even 4K-primary, to be given goals in evaluative thinking. Teachers give children a rule or a “yardstick” and ask them to make a evaluation of information. For example, “Our rules say that you will quietly form a single file line when it’s time to come into the building after outdoor recess. What kind of behaviors would not be appropriate for your being “quiet” and in a “single file line?” Young children can do analysis.

Evaluation is making a critical judgment based upon evidence. The key to teaching children to evaluate is giving them a rule or a measurement against which they can make a judgment and provide evidence to support their decision.

To build the goal of evaluation, teachers ask questions like –

  • Judging – Based on First Amendments Rights, should this writer be banned from publishing opinions in the local newspaper?
  • Defending – Do you agree with the historical proposition that a “man’s home is his castle” and justifies the use of deadly force?
  • Prioritizing – Given that your school has limited finances, which of these curricular programs should be exempted from budget reductions?
  • Critiquing – Looking at the past list of Booker Award winners, which of these books has the best likelihood of winning the next award?

Evaluation requires understanding and analysis. Evaluation is not asking for opinions. “Do you like this abstract drawing of a barnyard?” asks for an opinion. Saying “This is an abstract painting of a barnyard. How and how well has the painter used elements of abstraction to tell you the subject of the painting is a barnyard?” asks for judgment with supporting evidence. To make this judgment, children must first understand the vocabulary of art. They must understand the definition of abstract art, and they must understand the critical attributes of abstraction. Then, they must be able to examine and dissect a piece of art by identifying the specific attributes of abstraction exhibited in the art. Finally, they must put their judgment and evidence in a coherent explanation. This is HOTS.

An evaluative assignment takes more time to prepare, more time and consideration for children to complete, and significant time for a teacher to assess and respond to a child’s supported judgment. In addition, every child may make a valid judgment with differing evidence resulting in all children succeeding in an assignment that took a lot of time. And this explains why children have limited lessons pursuing the goal of evaluation. HOTS take time and the curricular calendar has limited time.

The goal of creating also requires assimilation of other learning goals. Creation requires children to examine their knowledge of information, their analysis of critical attributes, and their evaluation of the qualities of what needs to be created to engage in creation. Creating is not just applying in a new situation but the making of something new from what is known to fit a given situation. Creating also is using evaluation to determine the “best” elements for the new creation.

To build the goal of creating, teachers ask questions like –

  • Design – Design a family home for five persons that would survive fire, hurricane, and criminal intrusion. The home will be in California or South Carolina near the ocean and surrounded by woods. You are not limited by cost or material selection.
  • Construct – Given toothpicks and a bottle of Elmer’s Glue, build a bridge that will support a five-pound weight.
  • Reorganize – How would you reorganize the baseball, softball, football, and soccer fields on our campus to require 20% less square feet of area?
  • Develop – Create a story board depicting how five children stranded on an island would create rules for their survival until they could be rescued one week later.

Lessons requiring the goal of creation attach easily to STEM curriculum, technology education, and career development. They also are precursors to real world applications of school-based education.

The Big Duh!

Benjamin Bloom gave us a structure for teaching children to develop different kinds of thinking, of cognition. His taxonomy is a scaffold we can use to ensure that all children learn more than just a recall of information. Using his scaffold of goals, we can cause children to “think and do”. Bloom is worth remembering and his theory of learning goals is a tool for optimizing every child’s education.

I encourage and challenge every teacher to analyze and evaluate their annual curriculum to ensure the teaching of HOTS at all grade levels and in all subjects.

Teaching Is Caring and More

Posted on by
Reply

“Students don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care.” In the hubbub about public education, this message has risen and spread in the blogosphere. It is a kind of billboard message we read along the highway that catches a passing eye and then rolls around in our heads. However well intentioned, I read it as a shaming message. It infers educators do not care enough about the children they teach, and it conflates knowledge with teaching. Instead, I posit this: the profession of teaching requires caring, but teaching is not one of the “caring professions.”

Teaching and learning.

Our mission as educators is to cause children to learn. This simple sentence says it all. We can play around with the various nouns but not the verb. Educators, teachers, coaches, directors, mentors — each name properly says who we are. Children, students, adult learners, kiddos — they are the subjects of our teaching, people who will be changed by their education. The verb is what we do. We are in the profession of causation.

As a verb, the word “cause” has simple meaning. It means “to make something happen.” In the profession of education, teaching causes or makes learning happen.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/cause?q=causing

The French mathematician and philosopher Rene Descartes examined his world to understand fundamental truths. He observed that the physical world has abundant examples of situations where one action results in a predicted outcome. His empiricism led him to four questions that created his theories of cause and effect.

  • What would happen if I did X? 
  • What would happen if I didn’t do X? 
  • What won’t happen if I did X? 
  • What won’t happen if I didn’t do X?

Concepts of direct instruction derive from Descartes. A teacher determines an educational outcome and constructs a lesson that teaches students to achieve that outcome. Teachers plan and deliver instruction that causes learning.

Jean-Jacque Rousseau conceived that the best education occurs when children explore and experience their world. Rousseau is not empirical but relies on the happenstance of events; learning is not planned but is what is encountered in life. Problem- and inquiry-based learning derive from Rousseau. Teachers plan and facilitate rich environments in which students learn.

We see both schools of thought today in education. Early childhood education that is play-based allows children to experience situations from which they learn. Later, curriculum is both direct and inquiry-based and methodologies of explicit and implicit instruction are used to cause student learning.

Teachers are taught, trained, and licensed to cause children to learn and experience learning in childcare and 4K thru grade 12 settings.

Teaching professionals and Caring professionals.

The concept of caring is complex in the field of education. While we intuit what caring means, definitions help us to better understand what it is and is not.

  • As an adjective, caring means displaying kindness and concern for others.
  • As a noun, caring refers to the work or practice of looking after those unable to care for themselves, as in the caring professions.

All the synonyms for caring as an adjective — kind, warmhearted, softhearted, tender, concerned, thoughtful, responsible, considerate, benevolent, humane, sympathetic, understanding, and patient — apply to teaching. Teaching requires caring but its outcomes are different from those of a “caring” professional.

We expect teachers to know and understand the personal, familial, cultural, ethnic, social, and linguistic backgrounds of the children they teach. These expectations are explicitly written and described in the initial preparation standards for teaching licenses. We expect teachers to use this understanding to construct meaningful and appropriate instruction for individual children every day and each year the child in school. Caring is understanding children as individuals and each child’s educational conditions that must be effectively accommodated to teach children to learn. Caring is a commitment to move each child from not knowing to knowing, not able to do to doing, and not thinking about to thinking about.

These are examples of the “caring” professions: social worker, human services professional, human resources professional, law enforcement officer, lawyer, legal assistant, victim advocate, academic advisor, emergency medical technician, nurse, crisis counselor, psychologist, mental health counselor, firefighter. Each of these “caring” professionals requires specific teaching, training, and licensing for them to practice their profession.

https://www.snhu.edu/about-us/newsroom/social-sciences/helping-professions

Legal limitations to caring in schools.

While we expect teachers to care about the students they teach, we also demand a distancing of teachers from students. Teachers are not parents or guardians of the children they teach. There are legal and professional guardrails that keep caring teachers out of the realm of caring family members

We endow teachers with the status of “parentis in loco” meaning in the absence of the parent. In school, on the school campus, on school buses, and during school activities away from the campus, teachers, coaches, and directors are to care for the safety and welfare of students. We make rules and regulations to help school personnel know their responsibilities in caring for student safety and welfare. We also take careful precautions that limit the extent of care. “You can administer a band aid for a cut or abrasion, but you cannot stitch or authorize stitching.” “You may comfort a child who is in distress, but you cannot hug the child.” You may be criminally prosecuted if you cross professional lines.

And there are lines of teacher-student intimate contact that cannot be crossed.

Teaching also has professional limitations. A teacher has a contract to teach a specified curriculum to a specified group of children for a specified period of time. And to be parentis in loco during the child’s school experience but not outside that defined experience. At the end of the school day, teachers and students separate and go to their respective homes. During vacation periods, teachers and students lead separate lives. The idea that teachers are inextricably linked to the school classroom is told by a child who sees her teacher in the aisle at a grocery story on a weekend and asks “what are you doing here? Don’t you belong at school?”

The calling to teach.

In school interviews, I ask candidates for a teaching position, “is teaching your calling or your job?”  The question requires an old-fashioned concept of “calling” that is not commonly used today. A calling involves an intrinsic need to do something that you feel uniquely qualified to do or passionately enjoy doing. Even if the candidate does not recognize the word, those that feel a calling to teach usually convey the concept without defining the word.

We hire teachers who approach teaching as a job as well as those who are “called.” Those who see it as a job can become effective teachers. However, teachers who are called add a significant care factor missing from those who think of teaching as a job only. A calling plus effective teaching skills make an outstanding teacher.

Teaching is not childcare though childcare may be part of schooling.

School has changed because both parents or guardians in a household work to support their family. Working hours and school hours do not align and many families need some form of childcare before and after school. This relates to the supervision and care of infants and young children. The cost of childcare in 2023 averaged $13,600 per child.

To help their school families resolve this, many schools added childcare programs before and after the school day. School classrooms, gyms, libraries, and studios are available at these times for childcare activities. Schools make efficient childcare facilities because they have space, access, and toilets.

The purpose of daycare is simple: to provide parents with enough help to be able to function as independent adults: to go to work, to do chores, to take care of other adult responsibilities

https://www.chapeds.com/blog/1076359-pros-and-cons-of-daycare/#:~:text=The%20purpose%20of%20daycare%20is,other%20responsibilities%2C%20and%20so%20on.

Teaching and childcare are two distinct professions, and each requires training and a license to practice. “The childcare licensing program is a component of the services provided by Department of Children and Families (DCF). The program is accountable for the statewide licensure of Wisconsin’s childcare facilities, including family childcare, group childcare, and day camps. The purpose of the program is to promote the health, safety, and welfare of children in licensed childcare. The Department ensures that licensing requirements are met through ongoing inspections of childcare facilities.

Under Wisconsin law, no person may provide care and supervision for four (4) or more children under the age of 7 for less than 24 hours a day unless that person obtains a license to operate a childcare center from the Department.”

https://dcf.wisconsin.gov/cclicensing

What do we know?

Caring matters but not all caring is the same. Children know when adults care for them. Children learn the difference between caring parents and guardians and caring teachers and caring adults in childcare centers. Each care for children in a distinct way, at a distinct time in the child’s life, and with distinct outcomes.

When a caring teacher and child connect, we see how a significant adult can add greatly to the quality of how and what a child learns. Teaching fundamentally is caring about the adults children today will become in the future.

And frankly, teaching children today is underpaid, under-respected, and, given all the social and media distractions, downright hard. Why would a person be a professional teacher if he or she did not care deeply about children?