Teachers Teach Doers

George Bernard Shaw wrote in Man and Superman (1903), “He who can, does; he who cannot, teaches.” And since that time, an errant yet common belief is that teaching is for those who lack the capacity to succeed at more substantial work. Shaw did it consider teaching to be an esteemed profession.

We need to dig deeper into Shaw to understand his quote. Shaw attended four Dublin schools before dropping out in his early teens and engaging is self-education. Interestingly, one of the world’s great authors hated school. He learned instead from broad reading and constant visits to Dublin museums where he studied the art collection. Shaw learned from literary and artistic exemplars, often declaring that he was the greatest English writer since Shakespeare. He considered himself self-taught by his study of the best examples of what he wanted to learn.

There is such fallacy in Shaw’s statement. A stronger argument for teaching lies in “Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.” Educating children grows people and teaching changes the world.

What do we know?

When Shaw was school-age and until the early 2000s, classroom teachers were the primary source of information for learning children. A teacher not only managed classrooms, but a teacher also constructed curriculum, determined the content and skills children learn, and designed the pedagogy of teaching. The teacher, school texts, and the school library were the sources of student information. To use a common analogy, teachers were perceived as the expert in the front of the classroom.

We live in a new age. The teaching Shaw experienced ended in the last century. The Internet provides instant access to worlds of information, and tools of technology put that information at every student’s fingertips. Further, AI gives learners a tool for displaying information, if not answers, to any question a learner thinks to ask. Teachers no longer are, or are considered to be, the information expert in a classroom.

The role of teacher has changed, if not improved, and has become more important than ever. Today’s teachers are not the source of classroom information; teachers are navigators, curators, and elucidators helping children find, understand, and learn from the information they read, hear, watch, and experience. Each of these functions – navigation, curation, and elucidation – is essential for learning children in the digital Information Age.

With ubiquitous AI, children need teachers to help them navigate the world of information. Navigation has been an essential skill in Googling Internet information for decades. Left on their own, children are adrift in an ocean of information, especially information spread in social media. Navigator-teachers help children shape what they want to find out into questions. Questions are structurally worded into prompts. Prompts help AI focus its search so that the information displayed meets the student’s inquiry.

Navigation is an increasingly sophisticated skill set that children in their grade levels and various courses. Inquiries in science use the lens of a student-biologist, chemist, physicist, and earth scientist. The lens is different in the social studies where lenses taken on the inquiries of economists, geographers, historians, political scientists, and behavioral scientists. Each academic discipline presents a lens for how to navigate in the world’s information systems. Successful navigation is knowing and being faithful to your lens.

Teachers help children curate the information they obtain. Curation starts with helping children understand that AI searches are fallible and 15-20% of the information provided by a search is wrong, incorrect, or unsubstantiated. One of the great eye-openers is when children learn that AI hallucinates and often just makes up information. The deeper and more complicated the search, the greater the need for curation.

Curator-teachers work beside and behind children in their information searches. A curator is not like a parent on Halloween unwrapping every piece of candy a child brings home for hidden threats. Curators are information-whisperers helping children create their own filters for deciding the reliability and validity of information. Curation is not just a school skill set, but a function children need to exercise 24/7 in the real world.

Finally, teachers are elucidators. Information derived from an Internet search opens many opportunities for “teachable moments.” Teachers start by asking children, “What does this mean?” And “How does this connect to what you already know?” And “What new questions do you have now?” Elucidators also ask children “So, what?” Elucidation helps children find meaning and teaches them be independent finders of informational meaning.

The Big Duh!

This is my “so, what” moment. I modify Shaw’s quote to “teachers teach doers.” Every great invention and break-through event in our history stands on the shoulders of someone who taught an inventor or exploring person foundational knowledge and skills, who posed a “so, what” challenge, and stood aside to help the doing.

Shakespeare did not learn to write in school. He learned Latin and classical literature at King’s New School in Stratford. More to the point, he learned to write poetry and plays in the reality of his day – on-the-job writing and editing and performance. People in the theaters and local printers critiqued and commented on Shakespeare’s work and he refined his writing into the work we know today. The greatest English writer pre-Shaw used navigators, curators, and elucidators of his day, albeit they were not classroom teachers, to learn and perfect his craft. He could do and learned to become a doer. Shaw was a Shakespeare – he learned from others who indirectly helped him navigate, curate, and elucidate what he learned.

Teachers teach AND create doers.

Leave No Child Unconnected

Money and schools are in a constant dance.  It takes money to educate children in all the school-based programs our communities demand.  Of this there is no debate.  Schooling requires money.  Our dance with money begins and ends with governments.  How much will the state legislature allocate?  The state is the largest banker for school funding.  How many federal dollars will make it to local schools?  And, what amount of money will local taxpayers approve for the school board’s local levy?  Add together the monies contributed by these three levels of government and you have the revenue side of the annual school budget.   Although it seems that the “ask” is always larger than than the “get”, for the purpose of general education our schools are adequately funded.

Except.  There is one “ask” that has not been satisfied and now is the time to “get” this singular requirement of education successfully funded.  Internet infrastructure.  

Education is now married to the Internet.  The pandemic sealed those vows.  Every school and every child is an Internet user or needs to be.  In the post-pandemic, the requirement for students wherever they are to be connected to the Internet will not diminish – it will only grow larger.  Yet, we are nation of Internet patchworks that provide wonderful high speed connectivity for some and no connectivity to ineffective connectivity for others. 

If there was governmental funding power in Leave No Child Behind, we need to reword that charge into Leave No Child Unconnected. 

The Biden administration has opened the door.  Generally stated, the White House wants to provide significant economic relief that bridges all in our nation to a better post-pandemic economy, and, they want everyone in the nation to know that the federal government is providing that economic relief.  Infrastructure is large in their political-economic game plan.  The President has pointed to bridges and highways and dams.  Federal dollars dedicated to replacement and improvement of infrastructure will fuel business recovery and expand employment.  A great plan!  We have historical examples of this level of federal infusion succeeds, thank you FDR.

A part of the Roosevelt plan was rural electrification.  A part of the Biden plan must be rural Internet connectivity.

High speed Internet connectivity for every community must be one of our infrastructure outcomes.  Internet connectivity fits the White House’s agenda perfectly.  The Internet is the modern interstate highway of commerce, communication, and education.  Every person in the nation is directly or indirectly a user of the Internet.  Yet, too many are so far off the Internet grid that they are not within the economy.  We cannot raise everyone in our national economy without lifting those Internet connections into the economy.

And, the Internet is in dire need of governmental action.  The pandemic has taught us that a patchwork of local fixes to a national problem is ineffective and inefficient.  Cities and towns and villages and townships do not have the financial resources to create the Internet systems required.  We need to get the Internet off our telephone lines and power it through cables and towers and satellites.  A local tax levy cannot fund this level of infrastructural improvement.  We need big government to make a big difference.

Schools fit into this plan for infrastructural improvement.  When schools closed their campuses in March 2020, the Internet became the classroom.  Teaching and learning went on-screen.  However, children at home needed adequate Internet connection in order to be on-screen and too many had no Internet in their home or extremely poor Internet.  In the post-pandemic, remote and virtual education are not going away.  Remote education is the new option of parent choice of schooling for children.  The pandemic pointed out our extreme Internet inequity, an inequity that will only become more apparent with our increased uses of virtual teaching and learning.

A dredging up of the Bush slogan “Leave No Child Behind” makes this statement boldly evident – any child without adequate high speed Internet connection is left behind.

If I need to make more of an argument for this need to get a reader’s positive nod, then nothing I can write will succeed. 

We need universal high speed Internet connectivity in every household in every community of our nation and governmental funding is the only mechanism that will satisfy this need.  Our representatives in United States Senate and House of Representatives are the government that can make this happen.  They are the dancers on this singular dance floor and only they can create enough money to Leave No Child Unconnected.