Betterment Is A Teacher’s Constant PD

Maya Angelou taught us to “Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.” Her words are more than appropriate for schoolteachers whose calling to teach requires constant professional development. A teaching license is just the beginning of many emerging threads of career-long self-improvement. A teaching career is a pathway for constant learning of how to do better.

Betterment

I like the concept of betterment. Betterment is defined as the act or process of making something “better.” Better, as the comparative of good, means that the act or process creates something that is improved to be more than good. Betterment of teaching, then, is a constant ratcheting upward of a teacher’s proficiency in the capacities that characterize better teaching.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/betterment

We begin at “good enough.” Our educator preparation programs, as outlined in state statutes, license teachers who have obtained the status of good enough to be licensed. Teacher candidates must demonstrate the minimal requirements to earn institutional endorsement for a teacher license. In Wisconsin, these requirements are prescribed in PI 34 legislation. The same license is issued to candidates who superbly meet the endorsement criteria and to those who meet the minimal criteria. Good enough earns a license.

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/code/admin_code/pi/34

An employing school board can assume that a newly licensed teacher’s preparation is “good enough” to teach the school district’s children and curriculum. Further, in today’s shortage of people seeking employment as classroom teachers, a licensed teacher often is good enough to match children in a classroom with a teacher. Good enough is far better than no teacher.

Shifting responsibility for professional development

The impetus for professional development changed in 2019 for teachers in Wisconsin. Prior to 2019 teachers had to complete six credits of PD every five years to renew their teaching licenses. Beginning in 2019 teachers with six semesters of teaching under their Tier 1 licenses are eligible for a lifetime license. A lifetime license means a teacher does not need to do anything other than be employed in a teaching position requiring the issued license to be fully licensed for the rest of the teacher’s career. Professional development shifted from license renewal to the employing school board’s requirement for contract renewal.

Money makes professional development happen. Parallel to school board responsibility for teacher professional development has been the loss of federal and state funding for public education. Legislators used the distribution of federal funding during and after the COVID pandemic as a reason to diminish state funding. When federal money expired, legislators did not increase state funding but left school allocations at their diminished levels. The result is that most school boards must fund professional development for teachers from local tax revenues or not invest in teacher professional development. It is a fact that when school board revenues are scarce, professional development gives way to the many other needs of the school district.

Yet the need for PD for teachers has never been greater. The challenges of pandemic learning loss, the post-pandemic socio-emotional needs of children, and the increasing challenges of artificial intelligence in daily and school life require teachers to upgrade their professional abilities. The responsibility that shifted from state licensing requirements to school board contract requirements now shifts to teachers’ personal requirements for professional integrity. In the absence of district-led professional development, betterment is up to each teacher.

Be not afraid of growing slowly; be afraid of standing still – Chinese Proverb

Getting started on a self-help regimen is easier when a person adopts a proven strategy. A strategy is like holding a checklist in one hand and a mirror in the other as asking “What is my capacity to enact each of the ideas on this check list?”  I offer SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) as a proven strategy. It works like this. Set aside some quiet time for personal, professional reflection. Hold up each concept in your strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats list and ask, “What is my status here?” Be kind but be critical and make an honest appraisal.

Consider typical teacher strengths and assess your positive skills, understandings, and disposition for these. What can you do to sustain or even strengthen these?

  • Classroom management skills
  • Subject matter expertise
  • Building a rapport with all children.
  • Differentiating instruction
  • Creative lesson planning
  • Patience and empathy
  • Communicating with parents
  • Celebrating success

Consider areas where many teachers display weaker skills, understandings, and dispositions. What can you do to strengthen these?

  • Time management
  • Active listening skills – not just hearing
  • Using a variety of teaching methods – problem-based, inquiry-based, project-based
  • Incorporating new technologies
  • Getting overwhelmed with paperwork
  • Working with disagreeable peers
  • Accepting criticism
  • Managing paraprofessionals and aides
  • Adaptability – engaging every child every day
  • Resilience – teaching is hard work; keeping a positive attitude
  • Addressing bias
  • Maintaining a growth mindset
  • Cross disciplinary teaching

Consider the opportunities of professional growth, usual and novel.

  • District in-service
  • Professional organizations
  • Higher education
  • Conventions
  • Reading groups
  • Personal investigation

Consider typical threats to teacher stability.

  • Changes to school policies
  • Budget cuts
  • Increased workload
  • Ambiguity
  • New administrators
  • Lack of parental involvement/support

Set targets – what are you prepared to do?

My first pass at SWOT seemed disastrous as I created a lengthy list in each SWOT category. I was overly proud of my strengths, overly critical of my weaknesses, uninformed about my opportunities, and naïve about my threats. I set the lists aside for two weeks. My return to SWOT was more introspective and measured. What was my real status and how did I know this? And which S, W, O, and T did I prioritize as requiring my direct attention.

The result was a concise list of professional development professional understandings, skills, and dispositions that clearly needed strengthening, clarifying, and/or eliminating. Having the personality of an outcome-based teacher, I stated each goal as the outcome I wanted to achieve and strategized how to achieve that outcome. My Occam’s Razor question in creating my personal, professional development program is “What am I prepared to do?” Reality was that although I held something as a personal goal, I really was not prepared at that time to engage in that goal. Finally, I had two strengths to strengthen, two weaknesses to improve, one opportunity to pursue, and one threat to address.

The Big Duh! Betterment is continuous.

Do not SWOT yourself every day. Give target achievement plan time to unfold. Then, do not be afraid to SWOT yourself again. My outcome-based guru, Bill Spady, taught me that “success begets future success.” Betterment is a long-term process achieved with commitment over time.

Teaching Is Methodical

Causing children to learn is hard and complicated work. We use the word “teaching” to generalize how a teacher does the work of causing learning. Teaching, though, infers the one doing the teaching understands and uses a method of instruction that is chosen and honed to cause children to learn specific educational outcomes. If there is no teaching method applied, then a child could learn anything from anyone with the same likelihood of learning success. Or a child could be fully self-taught, who needs a teacher. Teaching methods matter and teachers need to understand their methods.

I teach in the manner I was taught.

Teacher preparation curriculum includes courses in teaching methods. Check the curriculum of any college, university, or other approved teacher prep program and one or more courses in “methods” are needed for program completion. Candidates for a teaching license must do student or supervised teaching to confirm their ability to teach students in the subject or grade levels of their license. However, once a licensed teacher is employed as a teacher, most find that their baseline of teaching reflects how they were taught when they were a student in K-12 schools. Predominantly, this method is labeled traditional teaching.

Traditional teaching is teacher-centered, emphasizes rote memorization and recall of information. It is structured within class time, uses textbook and publisher materials, and assigns children to work independently. Children read/watch/listen, do practice assignments based on the information presented, and take a quiz. The teacher is the source of information and skills children learn.

Teachers learn multiple methods in their prep programs.

An AI-study (Gemini and Chat GPT) says that teacher preparation programs today stress student-centered teaching methods with the key characteristic being learner-centered teaching. These methods include include strategies that

  • are tailored to student needs, abilities, and interests,
  • encourage active participation,
  • use the teacher as a facilitator of learning not the source of information,
  • are culturally responsive and inclusive of student background, and
  • use differentiated strategies that meet the needs of all children in the class.

As students, teacher candidates learn the theory and best practices for engaging children in their own learning. They can try these theories and practices in their student or supervised teaching. Teachers are academically trained to be student-centered.

Realities of the classroom are not academic.

Even after working in classrooms as a student-teacher, the realities of being THE TEACHER are overwhelming. I do not diminish the student-teaching experience, because it is essential for building confidence in oneself and learned teaching practices in a safe and controlled environment. Without student teaching or other forms of pre-licensing practice teaching, too many children would experience shaky instruction from untried first-year teachers. In student teaching there always is the presence of a hovering veteran teacher who will correct, fill-in, and polish instruction that a student-teacher left unsatisfied. Not for an employed teacher.

The first days and weeks in a classroom of your own is momentous for most first-year teachers. While a handful of rookie teachers claim to be wonderfully fulfilled by the challenges they face, many rookies spend sleepless nights and tear-filled morning drives to school worried about their ability to teach. The reality is that dozens of children sit and wait to be taught while a rookie teacher finds their way. A first-year teacher is alone in a classroom with a tremendous responsibility that feels like a burden.

Reality brings the rookie teacher to traditional teaching methods for several reasons. Creating learner-centered instruction is complicated. At the get-go, it requires time, trust, and confidence in a method. A teacher does not just announce “Today, children, we are going to use an inquiry method to discover why ancient and modern people migrate around the world.” It takes time to “set the table” for discovery-type methods of teaching. A series of lesson plans that model how children will “inquire” are necessary. The teacher needs to assure that all children are confident in the background knowledge necessary for inquiry into unfamiliar information. Children need to be prepared for collaborative learning. Student-centered methods become richer over time but every first experience with student-based learning requires thorough preparation, or it will flop. On the other hand, traditional teaching is very concise, straightforward, and teacher controlled.

When a teacher chooses an inquiry or discovery method, the teacher explains or demonstrates what the children will do to discover the unfamiliar information they are about to learn BUT the teacher does not provide conclusions about their new learning. The teacher helps children in drawing and confirming their own conclusions about their new learning. Facilitation skills are honed over time and can be a little messy as students drive the timeline. On the other hand, traditional teaching is concise and straightforward.

If the teacher chooses to use problem-based teaching, children must be pre-taught how to suspend elements of reality to make a teacher-contrived problem worthy of their time and effort. Once children learn what it means to suspend reality, PBL opens them to a multitude of learning situations – but it takes training and time.

If the teacher chooses project-based or outcome-based teaching, teacher and children must set up rubrics they will use to assure their student-centered learning meets grade level or course curricular standards.

Using non-traditional teaching methods puts a lot of planning, preparation, and facilitation pressure on a first-year teacher. To compound that pressure, children in student-centered methods are given responsibility for their individual and group learning. In the gradual release of responsibility from teacher to student there are inherent fears that children will not learn as much as they would have with teacher-controlled learning.

Lastly, traditional teaching aligns with rule-based classroom management systems. It is part of the “control feature.” Children abide by the rules or are disciplined. When principals make spot visits to classrooms, seeing all children seated and “working” fits traditional views of good teaching. Seeing children milling about, talking to each other, doing different things in the same classroom requires the principal to dig deeper into the teacher’s lesson planning and teaching methods.

The Big Duh!

Teaching methods matter. As methods, they are methodical in how specific strategies in each method cause different learner outcomes. These are outcomes beyond tested knowledge. We should expect and encourage rookie teachers to appropriately use methods of direct and explicit teacher-led teaching AND a variety of student-centered methods in their first year(s) of teaching. If they are not expected and encouraged to do so, it is too easy for a young teacher to become a traditional, single-method teacher.

It is possible to imagine a grade level K-5 and a subject course teacher in grades 6-12 being only a traditional method teacher. It is more difficult to imagine children sitting through their K-12 years experiencing only traditional teaching. It is even more difficult to imagine how a traditionally taught curriculum prepares children for this 21st century.

Principals and curriculum directors, please hire and nurture teachers who are prepared to use a variety of teaching methods. Coach them along their way. Your students and our future will thank you.

Teaching in the Upside Down

In the 1640s a song titled “The World Turned Upside Down” was popularized in England. Citizens sang it as a protest of the government’s ban on Christmas practices. Oliver Cromwell dictated that the historic celebrations of Christmas did not fit with his Puritan principles and values. By decree, the display of Christmas trees, ornamentations, and engagement in festivities were crimes. The tune fit the occasion.

In 1781 British troops reportedly marched out of Yorktown as their band played “The World Turned Upside Down”. The concept that a British army would surrender to colonials made those soldiers think the world order had been upended. The tune fit the occasion.

In our most recent past, federal, and state legislation that supports banning books in classrooms, narrowing the scope of our national history by banning minority stories and personalities, requiring the display of religious documents, and culling immigrant children, and condemning diversity of thought bring to mind “The World Turned Upside Down.” The tune fits the occasion.

I was prepared to be an English and social studies teacher decades ago. My baccalaureate and university training for classroom teaching fit my early life fascination with the stories of humankind. Stories that illuminate who we are, what we do, and why we do it are golden to me. Literature and history intertwined in my brain as I tried to make sense of people, the world, and issues.

There is a line in the Wisconsin state statutes that has supported a teacher’s mission to cause children to be educated and informed thinkers. Stat. 118.01(2)(a)2 reads as follows:  “Educational Goals – Analytical skills, including the ability to think rationally, solve problems, use various learning methods, gather and analyze information, make critical and independent judgments and argue persuasively. This goal, supported by others, gives teachers license to present children with diverse resources, information, and data for their consideration and to support their conclusions.”

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/119

Now, there are books and stories we are not to teach to children and Cromwellian stories and dictates we are to teach. There are things teachers are not to talk about. A revised version of the old song is in order: Teaching in an America Turned Upside Down.

Lessons That Cause Learning Are Like Cookie Recipes That Must Be Perfected Over Time

“I really nailed that lesson!” A teacher can have that feeling at the end of a lesson or school day and the smile of success feels wonderful. A “nailed” lesson is like eating a freshly baked chocolate chip cookie in which all the ingredients come together for a completely satisfying bite of life. And like a favorite cookie eaten and enjoyed, a teacher knows that all lessons are not created equally, so she savors the moment.

We cause children to learn with the lessons we teach. Our curriculum provides a continuum of learning targets that achieve larger educational goals for children’s education. Teachers make those targets into lessons that teach content knowledge, skills, and/or contexts for how students use knowledge and skills. Lessons are episodic because they fit into a singular place and time in a curriculum. We teach lesson in a unit once each school year and do not teach that lesson again until the next group of children are ready for that episodic lesson. Therein lies a rub.

Lessons, as clinical tools designed to cause specific learning, must be analyzed for their effectiveness after each time they are taught. It is like eating a hot just from the oven cookie – we bite into it, chew it, and taste it to verify that it satisfies. If we do not analyze lesson effectiveness, we do not know if lessons really cause the learning desired. Analyzing a lesson is biting into it and chewing with student learning as the taste that matters. Without analysis for effectiveness any old lesson will do, and instead of causing learning teachers are daycare providers.

What do we know?

Teaching and learning are cause and effect. We do not know the effect of the teaching until we assess for learning. After teaching a lesson, the teacher formatively assesses student learning with a test or performance or demonstration of learning. That assessment creates data about how well each child learned the educational objective of the lesson. The data is what decides if the lesson is a success, a failure, or if the lesson needs improvement. Every lesson a teacher teaches needs assessment and evaluation. If not, education stumbles around in the dark.

We also know that schools do not provide teacher time for lesson analysis. Nada! Schools treat lessons as “contracted line work” – one lesson follows another until a week of lessons and a semester of lessons and a year of lessons have been taught. There is no institutional time set aside for lesson analysis when lessons are line work.

After teaching a lesson, a teacher helps students with their independent practice, homework or other assignments stemming from this lesson, collect assignments and prepares to teach the next lesson. There is no school time nor expectation that a teacher will or should pause other work to evaluate the assessments of lessons taught.

We know that schools do give nominal time for teacher preparation of lessons. Daily prep time however is when principals, counselors, and parents talk with a teacher, or a teacher responds to their communications. Prep time is a teacher’s “bio” break time. And prep time is when a teacher actually takes a break in an otherwise fully packed school day of line work.

Schools also expect a teacher to “prep” on her own time. This may be before or after the school, but “own time” most often is at home wedged into a teacher’s family and personal time. Schools do not keep track of how much “own time” a teacher spends on schoolwork; it is assumed to be part of the job. Own time at home is not truly focused time for lesson evaluation. This assumption fails tests of best educational practice and contributes to teacher burn out and dissatisfaction with teaching as a career.

A better idea!

At first blush, providing teacher time for lesson evaluation really is a “no brainer.” Every artist stands back from their work to study what they have done, consider its form, function, and beauty, and returns with ideas of how to make it better. Why wouldn’t school leaders provide time for teachers to step back and conduct lesson analysis? Time is a logistical problem. How do we provide time for lesson study with children in school? Simple – dismiss the children. Teachers cannot give their mind and effort to lesson analysis during a school day with children in the schoolhouse. Also, few teachers can walk out of a classroom straight into lesson analysis knowing that they still have lessons to prepare for the next day.

Provide protected and dedicated time for lesson analysis to assure the teachers can give their best attention and efforts at lesson improvement. Add paid days to each teacher’s annual contract for this professional work. A month of days should suffice.

Second, collaboration and collegiality are needed for objective lesson analysis. Getting the cook’s thumbs up on freshly baked cookies is one person’s subjective opinion: most cook’s like their own baked goods. Getting opinions from other bakers provides objectivity and validation.

Within the protected and dedicated time, create small teams for lesson studies. Team members must have commonality in their grade level (child development) or subject area content or their comments are without evidentiary substance. At the same time, there can be no competition within a lesson study. In our era of “choice” – parents choosing teachers – teachers in the same grade level cannot be using lesson study to gain advantage over their peers. Best practice is “what is said in lesson analysis stays in lesson analysis,” the benefit of study shows in the next iteration of lessons.

Third, lesson analysis is data and evidence driven. When a teacher presents her lesson she also presents the formative and summative data related to the lesson. She talks of the cause and effect of teaching and learning so that she can improve the “cause” to get better “effect” next time. A lesson analysis without data is just anecdotal – there is no evidence of learning.

Fourth, all the rules of collaborative group work apply. This is professional work at its highest level and requires respect, integrity, and good will. After presenting a lesson and its data, the group pauses for each member to consider the presentation and make notes for their comments. Then the presenter becomes a listener, recording comments that make sense for the perfection of the lesson. There is no tacit agreement that a presenter will take all comments to heart. As a professional, she considers group comments as objective insights. In truth, if she uses only one comment to improve the lesson, the lesson analysis was beneficial.

Fifth, principals and curriculum directors have a place in lesson analysis. While some may feel that administrative presence discourages peer comments, it sanctions all comments. There is no teacher evaluation in a lesson analysis – neither of the presenter or of the commenters. An administrator is not a referee in the process but a contributor to and reporter of the process. Principals and directors can add larger data perspectives to the analysis of a lesson’s specific learner objectives. As importantly, they can report to district and board leadership on the tangible benefits of district commitment to lesson studies. Without their reporting up the chain of command, lesson studies happen in the dark and things that live there do not last long when district resources are limited.

The Big Duh!

Very few school leaders reading this or any other writing about the value of lesson analysis will support this work unless they believe that every lesson taught to children matters. If leadership is into the business of “line work” and daycare, lesson analysis is not their thing. But, if they believe that lessons cause children to learn and teaching is all about causing learning, then new conversations can begin.

Paying Attention Is Learned Not Innate

Mark Twain wrote, “In America, we hurry… what a robust people, what a nation of thinkers we might be, if we would only lay ourselves on the shelf occasionally and renew our edges!” (Following the Equator, 1897) Thinking and considering a topic takes time. However, we are quick people.” Twain was writing about the quickening of the American attention span 130 years ago. If being in a hurry was true for Twain in the 1890s, we are in a mega-hurry today. In the last two decades, the average human’s attention span decreased from 12 seconds to 8.25 seconds. Gen Z’s attention span is a little less than eight seconds!

Average attention span

What does this mean for educators? We either must learn to talk and teach faster or learn how to increase the attention span of the children we teach.

What do we know?

First, we know that educating children does not live in a vacuum; teaching and learning are influenced by our greater culture. A child’s attention span at home and at play is the attention span they bring to school. As we watch children at school when they are not engaged in teaching and learning, they clearly live in micro-moments of conversation and activity. Like honeybees, children flit from one activity to the next, often in no discernible order. If busy is a child’s nature, children are nurtured by a parenting culture that purposefully keeps them busy.

At school, part of their hurry before, during, and after school is caused by a school day that does not give them down time. There is barely enough time for toilet stops and nutrition as we shuffle them on and off buses, from classroom to classroom, and to a lunch break with more time standing in line than eating. Organizationally, we literally chase children through a school day.

Why, then, are we surprised when these same children lose interest in school assignments? Why do we frown when they look up and fidget two minutes into reading three, four, or five pages of material? Why do we feel agitated when constantly repeating to students “now, pay attention, please!”  We know the answers. Too often, schoolwork does not match children’s attention spans, and we do not teach children to extend their abilities to pay attention.

Second, we know that an attention span is a real phenomenon. By definition, attention span is the length of time an individual can concentrate on one specific task or other other item of interest.”

APA definition

Is an attention span important for life and learning? You bet it is. “Attention span is a crucial cognitive function that influences our ability to focus, learn, and accomplish tasks. As we progress through various stages of life, our attention span undergoes significant changes, influenced by diverse factors such as brain development, environmental influences, and individual differences. Understanding these changes can help us optimize our learning and productivity at different ages.”

Attention Span by Age

Third, we know that attention spans change. A person’s attention span naturally develops over time. Infants to age three have rapid-fire attention spans, ranging from a few seconds to several minutes. Their entire environment engages them simultaneously and they do not focus on isolated things for long. Children from birth to age three hear, see, and do many things for the first time and all their world is exciting and stimulating.

Early childhood children grow their attention spans to between five and fifteen minutes in duration. However, they also can be easily distracted. Play-based instruction helps young children to piggyback learning onto their play and use play to learn.

Children in the primary and intermediate ages continue to lengthen their attentions spans. As a generalization, they add five minutes of attention span each year in this age group. By the age of ten, children can focus for up to thirty minutes.

Adolescence is troublesome for children to focus attention. “Raging” hormones, social interactions, and technology can interrupt their focus. On their good days, teenagers typically focus for extended periods of one to several hours. But there are days and times when they cannot.

The demands of schooling contradict what we know about paying attention.

If the speed of a school day is a problem, so are the curricular demands we place on teaching and learning. From the get-go, every grade level and subject area course has more curriculum than can be taught in a school year. After 55 years working with teachers, I am not aware of a single teacher who ran out of assigned curriculum to teach before the last day of school. School curriculum is the proverbial ten pounds of learning in a five-pound bag.

Additionally, we never diminish curriculum; we only add more to it. Everyday and every year adds new history, new science, new literature, and new topics deemed as important for children to learn. Have you ever been to a school board meeting where an agenda item was decreasing what would be taught and learned? Never happens.

It is no wonder that paying attention is so difficult when we do not present an attentional education.

Can we grow a child’s attention span?

Knowing the above, can educators help children to increase the quantity and quality of their attention span so they can learn better in school and in life? Yes, we can.

There are numerous tangentials we can manipulate to increase our students’ span of attention

  1. Physical activity. Before requiring children to concentrate, provide them with a stretching or in-place exercise to relieve their need for physical action and make ready for mental activity. Five to 15 minutes of body movement is good preparation for larger amounts of concentration. And insert physical action breaks purposefully between mental activities. Break up learning into chunks and insert physical activity between chunks.
  2. Attention exercises. Teach children what “paying attention” looks and acts like. Have children sit or stand appropriately so they physically are prepared to concentrate. Create mental exercises, like jumping jacks for the brain. Give them material to read or problems to solve. Start a timer and instruct them to focus their attention on reading or finding solutions. Stop the timer after a predetermined time and ask children to describe their concentration and what it felt like to concentrate. Repeat by increasing the time.
  3. Work within time framed expectations for children of different ages. As a rule of thumb, expect children to concentrate on one task for two to five minutes per their years of age. For example, 10 to 25 minutes for a five-year-old and 12 to 30 minutes for a six-year-old. For practical purposes, start all children at the beginning of their age time frame. Within these frames, identify which five-year-olds can focus for 10 minutes and which can focus for up to 25 minutes. Over time, focus activities to increase all children of the same age towards the upper end of their time frame.
  4. Remove visual distractions. For children struggling with their concentration, remove visual clutter. The only thing on a child’ desk or table should be what the item for their focus. As children need other materials and resources, provide them in their order of need. Keep brains focused on the task at hand not looking at stuff not yet needed.
  5. Keep classroom walls and spaces quiet. Bright and colorful and detailed posters and signs draw their peripheral vision and then their attention. Older children with stronger attention spans can handle busier environments.
  6. Use memory exercises. Integrate card, board, and on-screen games that require children to remember facts, chronology, and variations in details. Children today are gamers so game their brains with knowledge and skill building games. All games, however, should involve competition against the learning outcomes, how much a child can do and how well, not against other children.
  7. Have each child rate the challenge of their assignments and keep  track of the rating and where the child begins to lose focus. Children quit engaging in activities they label as hard and too hard. Use their self-ratings to provide each child with an appropriate challenge. As they succeed incrementally, their attention span for sticking with a challenging activity will grow.

https://www.edutopia.org/discussion/7-ways-increase-students-attention-span

Emphasize study to increase attention to study.

The root definition of “student” in verb form means “to study.” A student is a person engaged in study for the purpose of learning. To keep students, busy in school, we assign them an abundance of “doing” tasks and connote the doing of the task with learning. Children do a lot of reading and a lot of math without really knowing how to read for learning or how to learn from the math they do. Decrease the “doing” by increasing the “learning.”

  • Read with academic purpose. The trend in school is to have students read sections or abbreviated editions of texts not whole texts or content-rich editions. We think we do this to keep their attention, but the outcome is minimized learning AND minimized attention. At the end of the assignment, they do not know and understand deeply. They achieve less learning because we settle for less in our assignments.
  • Teach close reading. Or focused and strategized reading. We know reading is not an innate act for humans. We speak and hear innates, but we read and write only through learning how to read and write. So, teach children to read more intensely. With the right reading tools, their attention to reading and learning from their reading will increase.
  • Successive readings. Teach children to read a text assignment three times. Seems like redundancy, but each reading is different. Read first for main ideas and structure. Read second for specific details, vocabulary, and structure of the text. English lit is not biology and biology is not history. Each uses different words and structures for using those words. Read a third time for conclusions – this is what I know now.
  • Active reading. Teach children how to underline, highlight, take notes, select the most important sentences in a paragraph and paragraphs in a chapter. Teach them to “mark up” a text on paper or digitally.
  • Main points and evidence. Teach them to identify, mark up, and look at the main points of a text assignment. They do this by breaking using reverse essay writing techniques. In the structure of the texts and paragraphs, what are the leading statements and closing statements and what supporting evidence lies between.
  • Read whole texts.
  • Do not cheat students by assigning only sections for their reading and study. Give them the satisfaction of reading an entire poem or essay or text or novel. This means deeper and more purposeful teaching to support their reading of whole documents. Deeper study and learning does require deeper teaching.

The above only addresses how to read as a part of studying. Teaching for more complete and deeper knowledge, understanding, application, and evaluation of what is being learned applies to all school courses and subjects.

The Big Duh about attention span!

We really do get what we settle for. And children get what we settled for them. Attention span is a product of age and brain development. It also is a product of educational training. Educators have a child’s captive attendance through compulsory education, if not parental needs for childcare. As we have their physical presence, we can maximize their intellectual focus by explicitly teaching each child to be more intellectually attentive, to know and use deeper studying and learning techniques, and to own their personal learning.