Causing Learning | Why We Teach

Self-inspect Your Teaching Professionally to Prevent Meh!

Meh in the classroom is when a teacher does not know how good or bad their teaching is but just keeps teaching the same way day after day. Children know meh when they see it. They know it long before a teacher is aware of stale teaching practices and behaviors. It takes courage and effort for a teacher to inspect her teaching. And inspection requires professional assistance.

What do we know?

Classroom teaching is a black box profession. Teachers deliver hundreds of lessons without much feedback on whether their teaching practices and behaviors really work to cause children to learn. Their principal evaluates their teaching minimally in compliance with state and contractual requirements and provides formal feedback every three years. State assessments purposefully disconnect from statements about instructional quality. We make inferences only about state report cards and daily classroom teaching.

Even then, self-criticism is not easy. The curricular calendar and classroom dynamics work against a teacher’s understanding of the effectiveness of daily teaching. Grade level and subject area teaching assignments have an annual curriculum that always is more than a teacher can teach in a school year. Even with good planning, school life interferes with emergency drills, special observances, and assemblies, and unplanned “we need to talk with kids about this” topics. No teacher teaches a complete unit of planned instruction without school interruptions.

Also, children are complex learners. Teaching always is within the contextual interplay between children’s socio-emotional lives with their ability to focus on what they are being taught. Seldom is a lesson taught without a teacher’s need to consider or respond to extra-learning needs of students. For example, this month, October, traditionally includes homecoming activities in secondary schools. The rich schedule of pep assemblies, school decorations, homecoming dance, and girls’ and boys’ athletic events associated with homecoming create multiple instructional road bumps.

Lastly, even though teachers are colleagues with fellow teachers, they seldom to never see other teachers teach. While all PK-3 teachers are reinforcing their reading instruction with phonics-based strategies, they never see how the teacher next door is doing it. And the 8th grade math teacher trying to bolster flagging student math achievement never sees how the 7th grade math teacher filled in the math scaffold the year before.

Black box classrooms work against the improvement of teaching.

What does effective teaching look like?

The easy answer is that effective teaching causes children to learn what they are taught. There should be a tight correlation between planned teaching and measured learning assessments. But effective teacher practices and behaviors are more than that assumed correlation. I have known teachers who could plan and deliver a well-planned lesson that should have produced strong learning results. However, the teacher’s unawareness of student needs during the lesson or unawareness of her own speech, posture, language, facial expressions, and lack of connection with children in the classroom doomed the possibility that a well-planned lesson would cause good learning. As teachers make a proverbial “1,000 decisions per hour in their classroom, those decisions cover a myriad of practices and behaviors.

If good planning is not a consistent cause of good learning, then what is? Our teacher preparation programs point us back to the state’s approved professional standards for teachers. These standards were embedded in our license preparation courses with the hope that, at the end of a prep program, a licensed teacher would be imbued with these qualities.

In my work, I asked veteran teachers if they could recite the ten Wisconsin Teacher Standards from memory. Or at least talk about the ten standards. These interviews included veteran teachers with long records of their students achieving high scores on standardized tests as well as rookie teachers. Few teachers could recite the WI standards, though most knew some of the concepts of the standards. Fingertip knowledge of professional standards is not necessarily a correlation with effective teaching.

As another measure, I asked veterans and rookies about the preparation standards of their license. For example, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and the Council for Exceptional Children offer strong supportive guidance for the preparation and continuing professional development of math and special education teachers. Teachers have vague recall of the standards of that preparation and their connections with national organizations diminish over time.

In the absence of other information, we fall back on the end of chapter quizzes, unit tests, and state report card assessments to provide some data of teaching effect. However, these data may or may not correlate with good teaching. Test results also reflect what a child learned previously from another teacher, what they learned on their own out of school, what they infer but did not clearly learn from your teaching, and a lot of good guessing in their test taking.

Effective teaching is a process of connecting teaching practices and behaviors with desired learning outcomes.

Effective teaching is not a mystery. We know what it is when we see it. Effective teaching also is not an accident. We know how to produce the practices and behaviors of effectiveness. If not a mystery or an accident, then effective teaching is a qualitative state of our professional work we can focus on and improve. Also, the state of our professional work is not a constant quality but a variable that ebbs and flows across a career. Most teachers self-recognize when their teaching is superb, and they feel wonderful about it. They may also feel it when it is meh. However, when it is meh, they usually are unsure about how to change it. This is when professional inspection is needed.

Self-criticism, that is a teacher taking steps to inspect, criticize, and improve her own teaching, got much easier with technology. It starts with recording one’s own teaching and all it takes is courage and a smartphone.

Self-criticism is a required professional development disposition. Too often teachers believe that criticism is always negative and defeating. It is not! Self-criticism finds successes and challenges. When you watch Smile and clap hands when in self-approval. Also, take notes -write down – practices and behaviors you want to change.

Be bold. After you have listened to and watched recordings, ask a fellow teacher, a teacher you respect and trust, to listen and watch with you. Explain the purpose and process in your self-inspection and let that professional comment on successes and challenges. Do not be surprised if your colleague has difficulty with labeling and defining as the practice of self-inspection may be new to them as well as to you. Make this a collegial venture.

And do it again. “Again” means

The Big Duh!

First, a teaching career is supposed to last many years. A successful teaching career is causing all children assigned to you to learn what you taught. The feeling that your teaching is successful helps to sustain a lengthy career. Second, over the years, your teaching practices and behaviors will change given experience and school district priorities. The reality of professional improvement, however, does not change. While a public may criticize education, the educational system only addresses programmatic improvement not classroom teaching improvements. Last, teachers are on their own if they want to improve their professional practices and behaviors. So, pull up your socks and create your own self-inspection. Your career and your students deserve your doing this.

Exit mobile version